The end of 2017’s Q1 draws to close a quarter that saw the bull market ushering in its ninth year and politics domestic and abroad impacting markets in the United States and beyond.
The New Administration & the Markets
Politics certainly played a starring role in the U.S. market’s direction. Initial policy stumbles by the new administration may have actually contributed to gains as it became evident that Donald Trump will face considerable checks and balances, even within his own party. Most importantly, we know that while President Trump seeks big policy initiatives, most of the economy will continue to move forward much as it did before the election.
Politics aside, however, earnings growth on the corporate front reported from Q4 was more than enough to support the rally, according to FactSet. S&P 500 earnings grew 5% year-over-year and are estimated at 9.1% for Q1, and if met, this would be the highest quarterly growth rate since 2011. More so than politics, this was likely the true driver of a strong Q1.
Populism in the EU
It wasn’t just in the United States where politics took the spotlight, however. After simmering in Europe for years, Populism has gained traction and begun to have a market impact. Many Europeans want to maintain more control of their borders and no longer want trade rules dictated by the EU. The trend is a threat to the EU, and is likely one reason U.S. stocks have outperformed over the past few years. However, this quarter, international stocks outperformed the U.S. Much of this was currency related. The post-election dollar rally partially reversed as it became clear the new administration’s spending plans will face opposition. The euro got a boost in March with the defeat of far-right candidate Geert Wilders in the Netherlands.
Style Rotations Within Equity Markets
Perhaps more so than at any time in this bull market, we think it is important to stay diversified at the sector level.
Q1 featured a few notable style rotations within equity markets. Energy and communications, two of the best performing sectors last year, were the two worst. As we often say, sector leadership is always cyclical. One year’s biggest winners are frequently the next year’s biggest losers. While the technology sector isn’t nearly as overvalued as it was in 1999, and traditional value sectors are not as overlooked, there are similarities. Perhaps more so than at any time in this bull market, we think it is important to stay diversified at the sector level.
The Department of Labor’s Fiduciary Rule
The Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule, originally set to go into effect on April 10, suffered a series of setbacks in the quarter. The rule states that financial professionals working with retirement accounts, including IRAs, must put their client’s best interests first. Right now, there has been a 60-day delay implemented, but the final fate of the rule remains uncertain. Regardless of what happens to the rule, Personal Capital is a Registered Investment Advisor. We have always and will continue to act as a fiduciary and in our clients’ best interests.
The Fed & Rising Interest Rates
The Fed stayed on course – it raised short-term interest rates 0.25% late in Q1 and reiterated an expectation of two more hikes over the remainder of the year. Amid talk of rising interest rates, fear surrounding bonds remains elevated, yet much of it is misguided. Bonds still managed modest gains in this environment.
Media and investor focus remains fixated on President Trump and the political landscape. But in our view, the private sector and the broader global economy is likely to be the bigger driver for stocks in the coming years. Despite the gloom-and-doom tone of the election and pockets of geographic weakness, the overall economy is robust and stocks reflect it.
To learn more about this quarter, read our free Q1 Market Review and Commentary.
Craig Birk, CFP®
Latest posts by Craig Birk, CFP® (see all)
- Volatility May Be Sign of Market Correction, Not Necessarily a Bear - February 9, 2018
- 7 Things You Should Know About Your Finances - February 8, 2018
- Active vs. Passive Investing - January 29, 2018