How Much International Exposure Should You Have?

in Education-RSS, Personal Finance Essentials by

Lately, there has been a lot of noise in the investment world about how increasing globalization has eliminated the diversification benefit to owning foreign stocks. Don’t believe it. Foreign stocks continue to provide diversification and should be part of any efficient portfolio.

Ask any Japanese investor. Twenty years after the peak of Japan’s real estate and asset bubble in the late 80’s, their stock market remains down over 50%, even as the rest of the world has done very well. Will we become another Japan after our real estate bubble? Probably not, but the mere possibility means some diversification outside of the US makes a lot of sense.

But how much is the right amount?

This table provides a look at the annual returns and standard deviations of some S&P 500 and MSCI EAFE blends (EAFE is an industry standard proxy for the stock markets of developed international countries) from 1970 – 2012.

100% S&P




100% EAFE

Annual Return






St. Deviation







Although the differences are modest, we see that the 75/25 US to foreign blend had the highest return AND the lowest volatility of these choices. Higher return coupled with lower volatility is very rare and very desirable.

For the last decade, foreign stocks have generally outperformed. Thus, some have come to believe foreign, and especially emerging markets, are a better investment. Much the same was said about the US at the end of the 1990’s. There is no good reason to think one will do better than the other over very long periods of time. If domestic and foreign stocks continue to have very similar performance, then the benefits of diversification will continue to be modest. But the point of diversification is to protect against the possibility of future poor performance.

Some people point to the higher volatility of foreign stocks as a reason why they should provide higher returns. But the reason for the higher volatility is because of currency fluctuations, not the stocks. As the dollar goes up and down relative to other currencies, it reduces or increases the returns of foreign stocks for US investors. This leads to more volatility.

The bottom line is that for very long periods of time, return expectations for foreign and domestic stocks should be essentially the same. This gives us the following logic to build from:

  1. Foreign and domestic stocks are highly, but non-perfectly correlated
  2. Their long-term return expectations should be about the same
  3. Volatility is slightly higher for foreign stocks

Based on these three observations, modern portfolio theory dictates that rational investors should own a blend of the two, with a heavier weighting toward US stocks.

We believe foreign stocks should represent about 30% of total equity exposure for most US investors. This approximately maximizes the diversification benefit without taking too much risk if the US dollar goes on a long run.

Anything in the 20% to 40% range makes sense for most people. As of this writing, about 45% of the value of global stocks is in US companies. This means our recommendation significantly underweights the US relative to the global market.

For similar logic, we believe about a third of international exposure should be emerging markets such as China, India, Russia and Brazil, and about two thirds in more stable developed markets.

The following two tabs change content below.
Craig Birk, CFP®

Craig Birk, CFP®

Craig Birk leads the Personal Capital Advisors Investment Committee and serves as the Chief Investment Officer. His focus is translating improvements in technology into better financial lives. Craig has been widely quoted in the Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, CNN Money, the Washington Post and elsewhere. Prior to Personal Capital Advisors, he was a leader within the portfolio management team at Fisher Investments, helping assets under management grow from $1.5 billion to over $40 billion. Craig graduated from the University of California at San Diego and has earned the Certified Financial Planner® designation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Disclaimer. This Website may contain links to third-party websites. These links are provided solely as a convenience to you and does not imply an affiliation, sponsorship, endorsement, approval, investigation, verification, or monitoring by PCAC of the contents on such third-party websites. Please be advised that PCAC is not responsible for the content of any website owned by a third party.